RANKING AUDIT

Find out why your Chrome extension is not ranking higher.

Audit one keyword against the extensions winning that search. Get one bottom line, the evidence behind it, and the next action that matches the actual constraint.

Start an audit
ONE EXTENSIONONE KEYWORDONE MARKETONE LOCKED REPORT
Ranking Audit showing the current rank, bottom-line diagnosis, and listing and authority factors

Live Ranking Audit interface captured from an active Extension Ranker workspace. The report reflects the selected keyword and market at capture time.

THE FIRST DECISION

Compare your extension with the current result set.

A score leaves you with interpretation work. Ranking Audit first decides whether the evidence supports editing, building authority, or reconsidering the target.

EDIT THE LISTING

The result set says your authority is competitive.

When title or content is the weaker side, the report points to the editable gap and opens the same audit context in Listing Lab.

BUILD AUTHORITY

Copy changes alone are unlikely to close the gap.

When the listing is already strong but users, ratings, or reviews trail the winners, the report stops prescribing another rewrite.

CHANGE THE TARGET

The opportunity may not justify the effort.

When the competitive ceiling remains out of reach, the next action can be a different keyword instead of more work on the wrong one.

THE AUDIT SNAPSHOT

The conclusion keeps its evidence attached.

Every report is a time-bound comparison, not a generic grade that floats free of the market that produced it.

Locked audit context
SNAPSHOT · NOT LIVE QUERY
TARGET AI writing assistant EN-US search market · English listing
EXTENSION STATE Version 3.4.1 Listing and visible authority at audit time
COMPETITOR SET

The visible search result set used by this report

Top results captured
RANKEXTENSIONUSERSRATINGREVIEWS
#1Top result A800K+4.85.2K
#2Top result B300K+4.62.1K
#3Top result C200K+4.71.4K
#18Your extension180K+4.71.8K

Illustrative rows show the comparison structure. A real audit preserves the actual result set and observable competitor features available at that time.

DIAGNOSIS DETAILS

Separate listing gaps from authority constraints.

Listing is editable now. Authority is slower to change. The report uses that distinction to stop a weak authority position from being misdiagnosed as a copywriting problem.

DIAGNOSIS QUADRANT

What kind of work wins?

Optimize listing
Quick wins
Top player
Expand reach
Fix listing first
Then reassess
Build authority
Or change target
YOUR AUDIT
LISTING WEAKLISTING STRONG
RANKING FACTORS

Evidence categories used by the current report

60 separates weak from competitive
LISTINGTitle Strength
72 · OK

Target placement and title relevance compared with the audited result set.

LISTINGContent Strength
34 · WEAK

Summary and description coverage, frequency, position, and completeness.

AUTHORITYUser Authority
76 · OK

The extension’s user base relative to the extensions in this search.

AUTHORITYUser Popularity
68 · OK

Rating, review volume, and the interaction between those visible signals.

AUTHORITYQuality Signals
100 · STRONG

Visible Chrome Web Store trust markers such as Featured and Established Publisher.

Factor influence is not equal, and the current model can evolve. The public decision stays grounded in the evidence category and competitive comparison instead of promising permanent internal constants.

WHY THIS RECOMMENDATION

Understand how each recommendation is produced.

The report does not produce a list of SEO tips. It moves from a measured gap to the action most likely to change that gap.

  1. 01

    FACTOR GAP

    Find the weakest meaningful constraint.

    The report does not treat every low score equally. It first separates listing factors you can edit from authority factors that need another strategy.

  2. 02

    COMPETITOR EVIDENCE

    Check the gap against the locked result set.

    A recommendation stays connected to the extensions, keyword, and market that made the gap relevant.

  3. 03

    ACTION TYPE

    Choose the action that can change the factor.

    Editable gaps lead toward Listing Lab. Authority gaps lead toward users, reviews, ratings, or a different target.

  4. 04

    PRIORITY

    Put the most consequential action first.

    Recommendations carry priority, expected impact, current value, target value, difficulty, and a practical next step.

PRIORITY 1

Improve content coverage

Your Content Strength is the clearest editable gap. Bring target coverage closer to the pattern visible among the top results before changing the higher-performing title.

CURRENT Below result-set median
TARGET Top-3 median
WHAT THE OUTPUT INCLUDES
Priority

High, medium, or low

Expected impact

Significant, moderate, or slight

Current → target

The measured gap the action addresses

Difficulty

How demanding the action is expected to be

How to

Practical steps where the recommendation supports them

Next surface

Listing Lab for editable listing actions

PREDICTED CEILING

One controlled scenario, with the fixed variables visible.

The ceiling asks what the listing could support if editable listing factors were maximized while the audit context stayed comparable. It does not claim to know the future store.

MODEL SCENARIO
Current rank#18
Estimated range#11–14

The displayed range reflects model noise around the listing-maximized estimate. It is decision support, not a rank guarantee.

THE SCENARIO CHANGES

  • Title relevance
  • Summary and description coverage
  • Keyword frequency and position
  • Listing-strength score

THE SCENARIO HOLDS FIXED

  • Users, ratings, and reviews
  • Featured and publisher badges
  • Competitor features from the audit
  • Target keyword and search market

Chrome Web Store can use signals Extension Ranker cannot observe, including store-side behavior and experiments. A ceiling estimate cannot include what the product cannot see.

REPORT LIFECYCLE

A snapshot stays honest as the extension changes.

Historical reasoning remains useful only when the product shows which version created it and when newer evidence has made it stale.

  1. 01

    CREATED

    The audit locks its context.

    Keyword, market, extension version, factor evidence, recommendations, and competitor features are saved together.

  2. 02

    USED

    Listing Lab inherits the same snapshot.

    The editor does not ask you to reconstruct the target or competitive evidence that produced the recommendation.

  3. 03

    STALE

    A later extension version is visible.

    If the listing changes after the audit, the product can mark the report as stale instead of presenting old evidence as current.

  4. 04

    REFRESHED

    A new audit creates a new baseline.

    Rerunning the audit captures the updated listing and a fresh result set without rewriting the historical report.

AUDIT QUESTIONS

Understand what makes the report trustworthy.

What is locked when an audit runs?

The report keeps the target keyword, search market, extension version, factor scores, recommendations, and competitor features that produced the diagnosis.

How is Listing different from Authority?

Listing combines the title and content factors you can edit in the store listing. Authority combines visible user, popularity, and quality signals that usually take longer to change.

Why does the report show a predicted ceiling?

It estimates the listing-maximized scenario against the audit context, helping you judge whether editing is worth the effort. It is not a promised future rank.

When should I rerun the audit?

Rerun it after a meaningful listing or version change, when targeting another market, or when you need the recommendation to reflect a fresh competitor set.

Start with one target and leave with one decision.

Use the current result set to decide whether to edit the listing, build authority, or spend the effort on a better keyword.

Start an audit
14-day Starter trial · No credit card required